QgenticQgentic
Qgentic / platforms / opres
Qgentic OpRes · UK Resilience Management

Automated PRA/FCA Resilience Reporting.

Ensure compliance with UK PRA and FCA operational resilience frameworks. Qgentic OpRes programmatically generates critical compliance artifacts: the important business services register, third-party dependency mappings, and operational incident reports. Impact tolerance breaches are calculated deterministically using system timestamps to enforce objective assessment.

Self-hosted, air-gapped deployment available. Can be integrated directly into consultancy engagements.

Demonstration

End-to-End Reporting Workflow

Review a complete execution cycle: automated data ingestion from existing GRC tools, algorithmic tolerance breach calculation, manual approval gating, and the generation of a compliant, cryptographically hashed regulatory package.

Review GRC integration capabilities: Architecture & Data Ingestion →

Target Organisations

UK Regulatory Scope

UK-Only Financial Institutions

For UK-only entities — building societies, say — that answer to PRA/FCA rules on third-party mapping, impact tolerances and incident reporting, and have no reason to carry DORA overhead.

PRA/FCA Regulated Entities

UK banks, insurers, investment firms and FMIs: important business services, tolerance tracking and disruption reporting, with every step auditable.

Multi-Jurisdictional Groups

For organisations operating across the UK and EU, the platform supports both UK OpRes and EU DORA requirements within a single architecture and unified evidence portal. Review our Preferred Partner models.

Operational Scope

System Boundaries & Responsibilities

UK operational resilience involves complex, interconnected obligations spanning PRA and FCA rulebooks. Qgentic OpRes automates the specific data management and reporting layer, while strategic decision-making remains within your organisation's governance structures.

Automated Components

Reporting & Data Validation

The platform ingests existing data to programmatically construct service registers, third-party mappings, and incident reports. It enforces data integrity, calculates tolerance breaches deterministically, and generates the final regulatory package requiring explicit manual approval.

Strategic responsibilities remaining within the firm's purview:

Strategic Governance

Impact Tolerances & Service Identification

Defining which business services are critical and setting specific impact tolerances remains a board-level responsibility. The system validates the logical consistency of these definitions but does not generate them.

Testing & Assessment

Scenario Execution

Firms must continue executing scenario testing and drafting annual self-assessments independently. Qgentic tracks actual incidents against tolerances; it does not simulate theoretical scenarios.

Incident Response

Remediation Management

Post-incident analysis, remediation planning, and subsequent operational adjustments remain internal processes. The platform provides the objective incident data required for these reviews.

Regulatory Nuance

Critical Third Parties (CTPs)

FSMA 2023 CTP rules apply specifically to designated infrastructure providers (e.g., major cloud vendors); standard regulated firms submitting typical resilience reports sit outside their direct scope.

The platform outputs serve as the foundational data for internal testing and regulatory review. Note: Qgentic generates the necessary reporting artifacts; submission must currently be completed manually via existing FCA RegData/Connect or PRA channels.

Execution Workflow

Automated Processing Pipeline

  1. Data IngestionConsumes raw data via REST API, automated file transfer, or CSV upload from existing GRC platforms without requiring proprietary plugins.
  2. Algorithmic ComputationIncident durations and tolerance breach determinations are calculated mathematically from system timestamps. Manual overrides that contradict the calculated data are explicitly rejected (Rule: OPRES-TOL-008).
  3. Data ValidationEnforces deterministic rule sets including FRN format verification, ISO 17442 LEI checksums, referential integrity across dependencies, and chronological consistency.
  4. Proactive Risk IdentificationAutomatically identifies and flags high-risk configurations prior to submission (e.g., material arrangements lacking exit plans [OPRES-EXIT-011], high-dependency sub-outsourcers [OPRES-SUB-012]).
  5. Authorisation & ExportA designated approver finalises the data. The system generates a cryptographically secured package (CSVs, JSON, and manifest hash) for regulatory submission.
How an operational resilience self-assessment is computed Your service inventory, dependency mapping and incident records feed the Qgentic engine. The model reads the service map and summarises test results; code decides the outcome — it recomputes every incident duration from its own timestamps, measures the worst disruption against the stated impact tolerance, and validates FRNs and LEI checksums. A tolerance breach is computed from the timestamps, and a manual override that contradicts them is rejected under rule OPRES-TOL-008. The run then stops at a named person approver, whose name, note and timestamp are written to the audit chain, before the important business services register, third-party register and incident report are exported with a manifest and a SHA-256 hash for every file. § YOUR SYSTEMS § THE QGENTIC ENGINE § THE GATE § THE SUBMISSION PACK Service inventory important business services · 3 in scope Dependency map people, process, tech 4 third parties Incidents + tests raw start/end stamps 2 in the period MODEL READS CODE DECIDES reads the service map extracts dependencies summarises test results drafts the narrative duration from stamps worst vs tolerance FRN + LEI checksums referential integrity A BREACH IS COMPUTED FROM TIMESTAMPS An override the timestamps contradict is refused. OPRES-TOL-008 · no wall clock in the maths 1 tolerance breach found · 2 warnings raised AWAITING APPROVAL A named person signs the report. marta.lindqvist approver · admin The name, the note and the timestamp go on the chain. no self-approval The self-assessment important-business- services.csv third-party-register.csv incident-report.json manifest.json SHA-256 per file rerun it in a year and the same input agrees audit chains VALID FCA PS26/2 and PRA PS7/26 · incident and material third-party reporting rules in force 18 March 2027 — prepared for the firm to file through that channel.
The breach determination is the whole point, so it is arithmetic rather than judgement: durations are recomputed from the raw start and end stamps, measured against the tolerance you stated, and an override that disagrees with the timestamps is refused outright. Nothing in the calculation reads the wall clock, so the same input reaches the same answer when an inspector reruns it a year later.
Data Integrity

Deterministic Validation Controls

System ControlPurpose
Algorithmic Breach CalculationEnsures incident durations match raw timestamps, rejecting manual tampering (OPRES-TOL-008).
Identifier ValidationValidates FRN structures and enforces ISO 17442 checksums for LEIs to prevent data entry errors.
Integrity MappingFlags material arrangements unlinked to specific business services as errors (OPRES-MAT-007).
Cryptographic AuditingMaintains hash-chained logs of all actions and requires explicit authorisation for export generation.

There is no public FRN check-digit algorithm, so validation pairs strict formatting rules with LEI verification to pin the entity down.

Output & Deliverables

Final Submission Artifacts

Regulatory Payloads

Produces formatted CSVs (third-party register, important business services) and JSON (incident reports) compliant with current regulatory standards. All files are securely hashed into a manifest and generated only following explicit authorisation. Console dashboards support automated deadline tracking for annual self-assessments.

opres-export: required csv/json files · manifest.json · incident summaries

Filing to the Regulator

The PRA/FCA do not currently expose an API for these reports, so the software operates in prepare-only mode: your team uploads the finalised outputs to RegData/Connect or the PRA, with proof of how every number was derived.

Licensing

OpRes Pricing Structure

Pilot Phase

£5,500 Flat Fee (4–6 weeks)

Your existing registers, shadowed and validated in full. Fully credited toward year-one licensing.

Cloud Infrastructure

From £1,500 /Month (Metered)

Base tiers: Starter £1,500 / Growth £3,750 / Enterprise £7,500. Metered billing applies to material third parties, validated reports, and finalised submission packages.

Air-Gapped Deployment

From £95,000 /Year (Tiered)

Fully isolated, on-premise execution with zero external data transmission. Refer to the Air-Gapped Architecture documentation.

Licensing detail is on Pricing. The contract stack: Master Terms, Schedule B (OpRes), and your Order Form.

Technical FAQ

Common Implementation Questions

What defines UK operational resilience reporting?

It encompasses the continuous evidence obligations mandated by the PRA and FCA (e.g., SYSC 15A), requiring firms to document important business services, impact tolerances, third-party dependencies, and disruption events.

Who identifies important business services?

The firm's executive board is responsible for defining these services based on potential risk to consumers or market integrity. Qgentic provides the system to validate and record these decisions; the decisions themselves stay with the board.

How are impact tolerances managed?

Tolerances are recorded as testable limits (typically durations). Qgentic mathematically evaluates actual incident timestamps against these predefined limits, removing subjective interpretation from breach reporting.

How does OpRes differ from DORA?

DORA is EU law built around a reporting format; UK OpRes is PRA/FCA supervision built around impact tolerances. Multinationals run both on one Qgentic engine. See DORA Architecture.

What specific tasks does Qgentic automate?

Qgentic automates data assembly, deterministic validation, algorithmic breach calculation, and report generation. The firm retains responsibility for strategic policy decisions, scenario testing, and internal remediation efforts.

Why does the system not submit directly via API?

The PRA and FCA do not currently expose an automated API for these specific operational resilience submissions. Qgentic automates all steps up to the final export, preparing the exact files required for manual upload to regulatory portals.

Ensure Objective Compliance. Replace subjective reporting with deterministic, evidence-backed regulatory artifacts. View the demonstration to observe automated tolerance breach calculations.